Robin Chase: Zipcar's founder shifts to a new gear

Written By limadu on Selasa, 04 Desember 2012 | 22.16

Robin Chase with a Buzzcar in France

(Fortune) -- Like a lot of Entrepreneurs, Robin Chase got the idea for a business from personal experience. In the case of Zipcar (ZIP), which she launched 12 years ago, Chase, now 54, needed a second car for her family -- but only on occasion. The result? Her Boston startup has become the world's leading car-sharing network, with annual revenue of $242 million in 2011. Chase, who stepped down as CEO in 2003, is now behind Buzzcar, a service that lets car owners rent out their own vehicles in France. While she declines to reveal numbers, her co-investor in Buzzcar is Mobivia, a French company that supports sustainable transportation practices. Her story:

My father was an American diplomat, so I have lived in different countries. I grew up primarily in Swaziland and have a global view of the world. My mother was incredibly entrepreneurial. She started a number of cottage industries in several countries, ranging from handicrafts to clothing design.

I started college in Paris, then graduated from Wellesley College with a liberal arts degree in 1980. After that, I went to work for JSI in Boston, which handled large USAID [U.S. Agency for International Development] contracts in public health. I saw how programs were being run by people who had no knowledge of finance, so I decided to go to business school.

When I graduated from the MIT Sloan School of Management in 1986, I was both ambitious and raising babies. I had three children -- three years apart -- and from the time I finished business school to the time I founded Zipcar, I worked full-time, part-time, or no time, depending on how old the children were, and my husband's job. My husband [Roy Russell] is an electrical engineer who worked with tech teams on speech recognition.

In September 1999, I was talking with Antje Danielson, whose child was then best friends with my 6-year-old. Antje was German and had seen car sharing in Berlin. I'd just taken a year off from working and was looking to do a startup.

MORE HOW WE GOT STARTED: BET'S Bob Johnson

My husband and I were living in Cambridge, Mass., with one car. There was no way I wanted a second car because I drove so infrequently. Instead, I wanted a car that I could rent by the hour or the day and that I didn't have to own, so the idea of car sharing instantly appealed to me.

In 1999 it was the peak of the dotcom boom. Fifty percent of the population had Internet access at work, and 25% had cellphones. Wireless was the buzz of the entrepreneurial community. As Antje and I talked, I thought, Car sharing is what the Internet was meant for -- sharing specific resources among large groups of people -- and Zipcar would be a great application for wireless.

Here's how Zipcar works. You make a car reservation online or by phone for a specific car at a specific time. That information gets sent to the car wirelessly. The Zipcar member uses his card to open the car. After driving it, he returns it and locks it, and the billing is done. The rental transaction takes 30 seconds, and the car opens only to the renter. So it's self-service, autonomous, and takes only a few seconds.

With that idea, we decided to form a company. Antje's job was to deal with vehicle technology and get hold of the car leases. I did the fundraising, building the website, marketing, designing a payment system, and everything else.

After I wrote a business plan, we went to see Glen Urban, who was the dean at MIT's Sloan School in December 1999. He had worked in marketing with car manufacturers and said Zipcar was a brilliant idea. He told us we'd need to raise twice as much money, move twice as fast, and get right on it.

MORE HOW WE GOT STARTED: Secrets of the truck stop king

I wandered around the house for the next three days thinking, Do I really want to do this? My 12-year-old daughter asked, "What's going on?" She and I had been talking about Unicef, and I said I needed to decide whether I want to devote time to this company on a big scale, which would mean less time with the family. She asked, "So does this mean you could become rich and could give more money to Unicef and save lots of children's lives?" I said yes. She said, "Do it."

So in January 2000 we incorporated. I had raised $75,000 by the day we launched with four cars in June 2000. The first $50,000 came from Jean Hammond, a Sloan classmate (founder of Quarry Technologies and AXON Networks), who was the first millionaire among us.

The remaining $25,000 came at the last minute from an angel investor I'd been working on. Three days before launch, we had $67 in the bank and one car we had bought -- with my house as a down payment -- to use as a beta-test car. Out of the blue, the leasing company wanted a $7,000 down payment for each of the three other cars in the fleet. I was at a startup launch party, and Juan Enriquez (now managing director of Excel Medical Ventures) came up to me and said, "What can I do for you?" I said, "I need $25,000 by tomorrow morning," and he said, "Done."

I was working out of our spare bedroom doing 100-hour workweeks, but it was a joy. In September 2000, my husband quit his job as director of software development for Lernout & Hauspie, and became the company's CTO. He was on Zipcar's payroll only half-time, and we reversed roles. He became the primary child caretaker, and while I paid him half-time, he actually worked full-time. For the first year of Zipcar, I didn't pay myself. Antje had a child that fall, and after coming back to work, she decided to leave in January 2001.

MORE HOW WE GOT STARTED: The Blue Man Group

We broke even our first year. From the beginning, Zipcar grew month-over-month, between 7% and 12%. The decision to expand to other cities came after we closed $1.3 million in Series A financing. Investors said having a successful company in Boston didn't prove that Zipcar was a successful concept.

So I raised $2 million on a convertible note in the fall of 2001, and we launched next in Washington, D.C., because there was a group of citizens who wanted car sharing there. When we closed the books for September 2001, the entire travel industry had come to a halt because of 9/11, but Zipcar continued to grow month over month. We proved that we weren't a luxury, discretionary spend. We were a utility, and in February 2002 we launched in New York City.

Along the way, we opened in a number of university towns. Zipcar is targeted at people who don't need a car to get to work, and universities are a natural fit. Early on, MIT and Harvard gave us parking spaces and helped market the company. We eliminated the need for each of them to build a parking garage on their campus because of the large number of people who shared Zipcar instead of driving and parking their own vehicles.

When I finished raising a $7 million round of financing in 2003, we were on the road to profitability. I also had a father who was dying, and a daughter who was becoming a supermodel at age 16. (Cameron Russell, now 25, models for Calvin Klein, Prada, Chanel, and many other designers.) I was a complete wreck, and decided I'd done everything I wanted to do. I stepped down as CEO in 2003, stayed on the board for two years, then left. I still hold some shares in the company.

After Zipcar, I did a Loeb fellowship at Harvard for a year and learned a lot about urban planning, transportation, and the Internet. I started a ride-sharing company called Goloco.com in 2007, but was too early with it. America's not ready for ride sharing. It will be one day, but not now.

MORE HOW WE GOT STARTED: The Lucky Jeans guys

France is a step ahead of the U.S. in transportation practice. It had been leading with shared transportation in bikes, and I'd been consulting with the city of Paris on transportation with one-way electric-car sharing on a large scale. It launched 1,800 such cars in Paris in December last year, and I wanted to be in the mix.

So in June 2011, I started Buzzcar in France, which allows you to rent your own car to friends and neighbors. The company is 15 months in now, with 12,000 members and 1,500 cars throughout France. My co-investor is a large, privately held French transportation company named Mobivia.

It's exciting to have a vision, to persuade people to invest in what you're building, and a privilege to see it play out, despite many a miserable and hard day. I joke, yet believe, that transportation is at the center of our daily lives. Our outlook is colored by what it was like to get to work and home. Transportation contributes to 18% of the household budget and 30% of the world's CO2 emissions. It's extremely rewarding to see the social benefits that have come from the companies I have founded.

My advice

Leverage other people 's excess capacity. I made a partnership with MIT in which they sent an e-mail to their 35,000 staff and students about joining Zipcar. It cost them next to nothing to do and, from a marketing standpoint, would have cost me a lot to buy.

Know your weaknesses and hire to fill them. I started a car company, yet knew nothing about cars. So I hired for my vice president of operations a man who had managed Hertz's (HTZ, Fortune 500) North American fleet.

Be proactive, even if it hurts. Very early with Zipcar, I put too low a price point on the car rental, and had to raise it twice. People said raising the rate would put our brand at risk. But if the price didn't work, we'd have gone under.

Stand out from the crowd. I wanted to emphasize that Zipcar was different from car rental companies, so we didn't use any vehicle that could be found in a car rental fleet. For the beta car, I chose a newly introduced green Volkswagen Beetle, which was cute and had cachet. I put our logo on the car because I wanted to draw attention to it, and it worked as great marketing.

This story is from the December 3, 2012 issue of Fortune. To top of page

First Published: December 4, 2012: 6:33 AM ET


22.16 | 0 komentar | Read More

Lincoln's luxury on the cheap

Ford Fusion (top), Lincoln MKZ (bottom)

(Fortune) -- You're hearing a lot about Lincoln these days -- not just the revered 16th president -- but also Ford Motor Co.'s luxury auto division. Ford is trying a relaunch. It is tacitly admitting that its sporadic efforts over the past 90 years to establish Lincoln as a top-tier luxury brand have failed, and it has to start over again.

The effort is extensive and includes new advertising, refined customer handling policies, updated dealerships -- and, of course, new products. Lincoln needs the help. "The luxury market is passing it by," says Warren Browne, author of the monthly newsletter Automotive Compass. "Lincoln is the only luxury brand that makes Cadillac look good. It has lost share since 2006."

What the relaunch doesn't betray is much in the way of fresh thinking about what a Lincoln should be -- or where its competitive advantage will lie. Its new slogan -- "We've reinvented the wheel by placing you at the center" -- suggests that it is punting on the question, and customers will have to come up with their own definition of Lincoln.

Their job will be harder because Lincoln is operating like the Detroit Lions fighting a salary cap. Ford (F, Fortune 500) is limiting the amount of fresh capital it wants to invest in rebuilding the brand. It has given Lincoln its own design team and some exclusive features, but it has determined that Lincoln share its engineering with the mainstream volume products that wear the Ford blue oval to hold down costs.

So the first model from the new Lincoln, the 2013 MKZ, will be a fancy version of the 2013 Ford Fusion with a different look and nicer interior, and later models will also keep close company with their Ford cousins. The decision saves product development dollars but keeps Lincoln out of the top automotive tier where the fattest profits are.

MORE: 2014 cars: A very early preview

The reason is that most of Lincoln's luxury competitors produce at least one exclusive model that isn't duplicated somewhere else in its corporate product line. Lexus, which shares much of its engineering with Toyota (TM), projects exclusivity with its LS 460 flagship, and Cadillac produces two exclusive vehicles, the ATS and CTS. At the top of the food chain, every Mercedes and BMW are unique to that brand. The big exception is Audi, which shares engineering with Volkswagen, but it does have access to VW's secret platform-sharing sauce that no other automaker has yet been able to duplicate.

Besides being unique, exclusive platforms enable luxury brands to offer the rear-drive cars that are preferred by enthusiasts, instead of the front-drive configurations that are used on popular-priced cars. Ford Motor no longer produces a rear-drive car platform -- the last one went out with the Ford Crown Victoria and Mercury Grand Marquis -- so all Lincolns will be either front or all-wheel drive. "Lincoln needs a broader portfolio, more performance and handling in their vehicles to add some verve and get younger buyers in their cars," says Browne. "It needs rear wheel drive to be taken seriously."

Ford's unwillingness to invest in exclusive platforms suggestsc a couple of alternative explanations. One, that capital is scarce, and it can't spare any more for Lincoln. Another, it has found a better place to spend its money, such as expanding its China operation, where it sees a greater potential return for its dollars.

MORE: 11 best new cars in America

Most likely, Ford has determined that the luxury market isn't growing quickly enough for it to make a payoff on a big capital splurge. Besides the German manufacturers, Jaguar and Land Rover, which Ford sold in 2009, are thriving under their new owner Tata, and Hyundai and Tesla are eying upscale customers as hungrily as tiger Richard Parker did his boat mate in Life of Pi. Ford seems to have decided to accept near-luxury margins with near-luxury cars.

The fact that Ford is emphasizing customer pampering as much as vehicle excellence in its advertising suggests that it may be compensating for a less than dynamic product offering. According to published reports, prospective customers will be offered an overnight test drive, and actual buyers will get a gift of jewelry or wine, much as banks used to extend dinnerware and toasters to their depositors back in the day.

Ford has been punished in the past for excessive ambition. It crammed Lincoln into the Premier Automotive Group (PAG), Ford's holding pen for its luxury brands in 1999, and moved its operations to a new office building in Irvine, Calif. The idea, an interesting one, was to provide a vantage point from which designers and engineers could view the luxury market. But losses followed, and Lincoln moved back to Michigan in 2002. Under Alan Mulally, Ford dismantled PAG but you can still see remnants of it, like so many Roman ruins, in old Jaguar-Land Rover-Lincoln dealerships.

The progress of Lincoln's relaunch will be followed closely by Ford watchers for clues to future management ambitions. Global marketing boss Jim Farley, whose progress has been scrutinized ever since he arrived from Toyota in 2007, was handed responsibility on December 1. Farley is considered a master of social media, which is playing a starring role in the relaunch, but he has so far been denied a clear marketing triumph.

MORE: Ford unveils its (unlikely) masterpiece

In a delicious irony, Farley will be overseen by newly appointed chief operating officer Mark Fields, who ran PAG during its post-Lincoln years. Lincoln is only a footnote in Ford's financial statement compared to giant businesses like the F-series pickup, but the media will be measuring its health monthly along with Fields' ability to rebuild Ford's market share in North America.

For both men, the challenge will be to create some buzz around Lincoln that will enable it to rise above its pedestrian engineering roots, buzz that goes beyond the puffery generated by advertising that can be translated into genuine customer benefit. If Ford can do that, it just might be able to generate some sweet profits from its entry-luxe brand and develop a permanent identity for Lincoln in time for its centennial celebration in 2022. To top of page

First Published: December 4, 2012: 6:03 AM ET


22.16 | 0 komentar | Read More

Fiscal cliff wrangling pressures stocks

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- Sick of the fiscal cliff negotiations yet? Well, tough luck - the ongoing talks in Washington appear set to take center stage for investors again on Tuesday.

U.S. stocks opened mixed, as uncertainty over the ongoing political wrangling put investors on edge.

"For better or for worse, we expect markets to stay in the same sort of volatile, short-term back-and-forth environment until a deal is reached on the fiscal cliff," said Russ Koesterich, BlackRock's Global Chief Investment Strategist in a note to clients.

The Dow Jones industrial average rose 15 points, or 0.1%. The S&P 500 gained slightly and the Nasdaq shed 0.1%.

President Obama outlined a proposal last week that called for $1.6 trillion in new taxes, among other things. Republicans issued a counter-proposal Monday that included tax reforms, changes to Medicare and other spending cuts worth $2.2 trillion over the next decade.

That plan was quickly dismissed by the White House, and the apparent deadlock is likely to set the tone for markets.

Related: Alan Simpson: D.C. is 'totally confused'

In corporate news, shares of Big Lots (BIG, Fortune 500) jumped after the discount retailer posted a narrower loss than analysts had been expecting.

Home builder Toll Brothers (TOL) reported fourth quarter revenue that topped forecasts, sending shares higher.

MetroPCS (PCS, Fortune 500) shares slipped following reports that Sprint (S, Fortune 500) is not likely to make a counter offer to acquire the wireless carrier.

Shares of Pandora (P) were higher as investors geared up for the music streaming service's earnings release after the closing bell.

After the market closed Monday, Oracle (ORCL, Fortune 500) announced plans to make its second, third and fourth quarter dividend payments for fiscal year 2013 this month. The tech giant is the latest in a string of companies that have accelerated dividend payments in anticipation of higher tax rates next year.

U.S. stocks ended lower Monday.

Fear & Greed Index

European markets were mixed in afternoon trading, while Asian markets ended the trading mixed.

The dollar was weaker against European currencies and the yen.

Oil prices for January delivery declined more than 1% to $87.88 a barrell.

Gold for December delivery fell more than 1% to $1,697.80, falling below $1,700 for the first time since early September.

The price on the 10-year U.S. Treasury rose, pushing the yield down to 1.62% from 1.63% late Monday. To top of page

First Published: December 4, 2012: 9:43 AM ET


22.16 | 0 komentar | Read More

BlackRock: There's hidden value in CASSH

Written By limadu on Senin, 03 Desember 2012 | 22.16

The CASSH countries make up the latest catch-phrase on Wall Street.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- Move over BRICs. Look out PIIGS. Here comes CASSH.

The CASSH countries -- Canada, Australia, Singapore, Switzerland and Hong Kong -- make up the latest catch-phrase on Wall Street.

Russ Koesterich, global chief investment strategist for asset manager BlackRock (BLK, Fortune 500), coined the term in a recent blog post. "Because what the financial markets desperately need is another acronym," he said.

All kidding aside, Koesterich believes CASSH countries offer hidden value, and recommends investors increase their exposure.

Here's why.

While they are obviously very different, the CASSH countries have certain things in common that make them attractive as a group, according to Koesterich.

Unlike the United States and Europe, the CASSH countries all emerged from the financial crisis in a comparatively healthy state. There is no fiscal cliff or systemic debt crisis in these countries, which generally have balanced budgets and low levels of unemployment.

Given the advantage of a strong balance sheet, the CASSH countries are poised to outpace their larger rivals in economic growth next year.

Koesterich estimates that gross domestic product in the CASSH countries will expand 3% on average in 2013. That compares with about 1% in the euro area, and little more than 2% in the United States and Japan.

"Overall, the three developed markets are struggling with a number of headwinds," he said, pointing to unsustainable public debt and continued deleveraging by households and business. "These are developed markets that don't suffer from those headwinds."

Related: World's 40 best-performing stock markets in 2012

At the same time, the CASSH countries boast advanced economies and liquid financial markets. That should make investing in them less risky than emerging markets like Brazil, Russia, India and China.

The CASSH countries are also home to profitable corporations that compete on a global scale. Yet stocks in these countries generally trade at valuations similar to those in larger markets.

Of course, there are still risks.

Koesterich says investors should be aware that fluctuations in foreign exchange rates can eat into investment returns when converted back into U.S. dollars. But he maintains that foreign exchange risks are "balanced" for the CASSH countries and broadly similar to those in other overseas markets.

Related: World's 5 hottest stock markets

It's also important to diversify.

Koesterich recommends a portfolio with a 20% exposure to Canada, Australia, Singapore, Switzerland and Hong Kong. This equal distribution should help mitigate the currency risk and balance out the "basket" of countries.

Exchange-traded funds are probably the easiest way to execute this strategy. Under its iShares family of ETFs, BlackRock offers investors exposure to the CASSH countries via the MSCI Canada Index Fund (EWC), MSCI Australia Index Fund (EWA), MCSI Singapore Index Fund (EWS), MCSI Switzerland Index Fund (EWL) and MCSI Hong Kong Index Fund. (EWH)

Canada and Australia both represent big bets on commodity prices, while Singapore and Hong Kong are global financial centers. Switzerland is also a play on banking, although the nation is also home to major pharmaceutical and consumer staples companies.

Some investors may be turned off by the exposure to commodity prices that Canada and Australia imply, given the dour outlook for global demand. But the risk of a slide in prices for crude oil or metals is roughly the same in the United States, according to Koesterich.

Likewise, the banking sector continues to recover from the financial crisis and adapt to new regulations. Koesterich acknowledged that bank stocks can be volatile, but that is not necessarily a bad thing. In addition, banks in Singapore, Hong Kong and Switzerland are generally in better shape than rivals in places like Portugal, Ireland, Italy, Greece and Spain. To top of page

First Published: December 3, 2012: 6:08 AM ET


22.16 | 0 komentar | Read More

U.K. targets Google, Amazon, Starbucks on taxes

Britain accuses multinationals of not paying their fair share. Starbucks is reveiwing its approach to tax in the U.K.

LONDON (CNNMoney) -- Britain is to clamp down on tax avoidance by major international companies after a parliamentary committee dubbed efforts by corporations such as Google, Amazon and Starbucks to minimize the amount they pay in the U.K. as "outrageous."

"Global companies with huge operations in the U.K. generating significant amounts of income are getting away with paying little or no corporation tax here," said lawmaker Margaret Hodge, who chairs the public accounts committee. "This is outrageous and an insult to British businesses and individuals who pay their fare share."

Executives from Google (GOOG, Fortune 500), Amazon (AMZN, Fortune 500) and Starbucks (SBUX, Fortune 500) appeared before the committee last month, as it sought to illustrate the wider problem of corporate tax avoidance.

All three companies say they comply with U.K. tax laws but the pressure is beginning to tell. Starbucks said Monday it was reviewing its approach to taxes in the U.K. "We have listened to feedback from our customers and employees, and understand that to maintain and further build public trust we need to do more," Starbucks said in a statement, adding that it will release more details later in the week.

The British government is stepping up efforts to close loopholes for big companies as an economic slowdown makes it harder to meet revenue targets and in the face of criticism from voters and local businesses who say they are paying an unfair share of taxes.

Related: Buffett renews argument for millionaire's tax

The U.K will spend an additional £77 million pounds to hire more specialist inspectors and investigators in the hope of collecting £2 billion more per year from multinationals and wealthy individuals. Transfer pricing arrangements used by global firms will also come under greater scrutiny.

"The government is clear that while most taxpayers are doing their bit to help us balance the books, it is unacceptable for a minority to avoid paying their fair share, sometimes by breaking the law," finance minister George Osborne said in a statement.

Britain is borrowing more than it expected this year due to the impact of slower economic growth on revenues. It has a tax gap - the difference between tax collected and tax owed based on the letter and spirit of the law - of £32 billion.

Osborne is due to give an updated budget statement Wednesday. He will face the uncomfortable choice of abandoning his commitment to cut debt by 2015-16 or announcing further austerity measures, the Institute for Fiscal Studies said last week.

In a report published Monday, the public accounts committee said the evidence provided by Google, Amazon and Starbucks was generally "unconvincing" and drew the conclusion that multinationals were exploiting existing legislation to move offshore profits generated from activity in the U.K.

It described Starbucks' claim that it had lost money for 14 of its 15 years in the U.K. as "hard to believe".

"This was inconsistent with claims the company was making in briefings to its shareholders that the U.K. business was successful and it was making 15% profits in the U.K.," the committee said.

Related: Corporate profits hit record as wages get squeezed

The committee also criticized Amazon for being "evasive and unprepared" and said Google had undermined its position that profits should be taxed in the jurisdictions where the activity occurred by remitting non-U.S. profits to Bermuda.

Amazon, which runs its European operations from Luxembourg, said it pays all applicable taxes in every jurisdiction it operates within.

It generated some 25% of all international sales, worth about £3.35 billion, from the U.K. in 2011. Reported revenues for its U.K. subsidiary was £207 million with a tax expense of £1.8 million, the committee said in its report.

Google, which paid £6 million in corporation tax on UK revenues of £396 million, declined to comment but said last month it played by the rules and that politicians could choose to amend them if they saw the need.

Osborne also announced a new agreement with the U.S. to increase the amount of information automatically exchanged between the two countries on potentially taxable income. To top of page

First Published: December 3, 2012: 8:24 AM ET


22.16 | 0 komentar | Read More

Stocks: Still stuck in fiscal cliff rut

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- It's a new week but the same story for U.S. markets, with the focus remaining squarely on the fiscal cliff negotiations in Washington.

Stocks opened modestly higher Monday but the gains lacked conviction as the number of fiscal cliff negotiating days dwindle.

The Dow Jones industrial average and the S&P 500 both rose about 0.4%. The Nasdaq gained 0.6%.

After a go-nowhere November, some investors are expecting a rebound in December, if history is any guide. December has been the strongest month of the year for stocks over the past 30 years, as investors close out positions and square portfolios, according to research from Schaeffer's Investment Research. There hasn't been a negative December since 2007.

No major corporate results are due Monday, though data will be released shortly after the opening bell on construction spending and manufacturing, as well as on November auto sales.

Among the movers in early trading, shares of computer maker Dell (DELL, Fortune 500) jumped more than 5% after Goldman Sachs (GS, Fortune 500) upgraded its stock from sell to buy.

Shares of Yahoo (YHOO, Fortune 500) edged lower after a civil court in Mexico issued a non-final judgment of $2.7 billion against Yahoo Inc. and Yahoo de Mexico, S.A. in a breach of contract lawsuit related to a yellow pages listing service.

Bank of America (BAC, Fortune 500) shares rose following reports over the weekend that the bank was backing down on instituting new fees this year that would have impacted more than 10 million customers.

Dean Foods (DF, Fortune 500) announced plans to sell its Morningstar division, which makes "extended shelf-life" products, to Saputo Inc. for $1.45 billion.

Shares of BlackBerry-maker Research in Motion (RIMM) slipped after being downgraded by Canaccord Genuity, which cited concerns about the BlackBerry 10.

U.S. stocks ended November with a thud, as investors remain sidelined by the political gridlock.

Fear & Greed Index

Fresh positive data on China's manufacturing sector gave Asian markets an early boost. But fiscal cliff fears weighed on markets in the region. The Shanghai Composite lost 1%, the Hang Seng declined 0.9% and the Nikkei posted a small gain.

Related: There's hidden value in CASSH

European markets were higher, taking some comfort from the positive news out of China, and signs of an easing of the eurozone crisis as Greece announced details of a debt buyback linked to its revised EU-IMF rescue.

The dollar lost ground against the Japanese yen, British pound and euro. In commodities market, oil prices jumped 1% to $89.91 a barrel. Gold prices edged higher to $1,715 an ounce.

U.S. Treasuries, meanwhile, sold off, with the yield on the benchmark 10-year note rising to 1.66%. To top of page

First Published: December 3, 2012: 9:44 AM ET


22.16 | 0 komentar | Read More

Judge orders Paul Ceglia to pay Facebook $100,000 in fees

Written By limadu on Minggu, 02 Desember 2012 | 22.16

Ceglia will have to reimburse Facebook for more than $89,000 in legal and expert fees, plus nearly $7,000 for related travel.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- A federal judge has ordered Paul Ceglia, an upstate New York man who claimed he's owed 50% of Facebook, to pay the social network nearly $100,000 in legal and travel fees.

The order came after Ceglia canceled 10 planned depositions in July and August at the last minute, after Facebook had already paid its lawyers to prepare for and travel to the depositions. Seven were scrapped with less than 48 hours' notice, and three were canceled with less than 24 hours' notice.

As punishment, Ceglia will have to reimburse Facebook for more than $89,000 in legal and expert fees, plus nearly $7,000 for related travel.

The bizarre Ceglia-Facebook legal saga began in July 2010, when Ceglia filed suit in New York claiming that he paid Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg to build a website similar to what became Facebook, and that they agreed to split the company. Both Facebook (FB) and Zuckerberg have strenuously denied Ceglia's claims.

Ceglia's credibility took a big hit last month when federal agents arrested him on charges of perpetuating a "multi-billion-dollar scheme" to defraud Facebook. If convicted, Ceglia faces up to 40 years in prison.

The government's complaint against Ceglia echoes Facebook's accusations. Ceglia "doctored, fabricated, and destroyed evidence to support his false claim," according to a statement from the U.S. attorney's office. The complaint accuses Ceglia of altering a contract and inventing emails that didn't exist.

This week a federal jury indicted Ceglia on the fraud charges. His lawyer, Dean Boland, also filed a motion to withdraw from the case -- although Ceglia is fighting to keep him. Boland did not return a call seeking comment.

Ceglia has already lost several legal teams in the past. A judge will have to decide whether Boland will be allowed to leave the case. To top of page

First Published: November 30, 2012: 12:05 PM ET


22.16 | 0 komentar | Read More
techieblogger.com Techie Blogger Techie Blogger